Posted on

@adrianturner01: @CrisVanDutch @AwayFromTheKeys @TakeThatDarwin @alancolquhoun1 @CallMeEOnly @donniebets1 @acneonmyshirt @hesanaughtyboy @BabeTruth2 @malo_j @SimnMal @yourmomspants1 @Cleisthenes5 @SDarkmore @Wilkyway71 @EdwardwongY @Wolfpak561 @wiguy45 @SimonB1958 @Snowleopards12 @A_Damned_smith @zalphaprime @RobertBrownie @NarratingFools @CandySmith74 @willsworldview @RossGilroy @YorkshirePalaeo @Onychom @JohnKrahn2 @CrispyCurry @Avic_Wins @SBuddie1877 @WmManry @Thohi @TakeThatEpi @yoyoboy3000 @BabaT55311315 @Simple_Shaman @martin000023 @AllistairGraham @kester_lowers @ShatteredReaper @SavageTomas @LogicalReterg @TakeThatChem @Phoenix42505497 @derian_the_imp @badgervindaloo @oohglobbits5 1] you can’t even DEFINE ‘evidence. I quotemine as follows – Thus, molecular biologists beginning with Crick equated information not only with complexity but also with “specificity,” where “specificity” or “specified” has meant “necessary to function”

from http://twitter.com/adrianturner01
via IFTTT